All Time Low – Time Bomb
So far after examining three music videos, I can safely say All Time Low’s Time Bomb is one of the most ‘secure’ instances of alternative rock
(as well as one of the newest examples) that safeguards a lot of conventions,
whilst exploring the actual camera work and shot representation at the same
time; often leaving out some of the most popular conventions such as live
audiences. What’s quite nice and sort of fresh about Time Bomb is its obvious attention to detail to scene, costume, and
quality of camerawork –clearly shot in HD – as well as a few more elements such
as product placement.
00:00
Immediately the audience is introduced to the narrative –
whilst this isn’t non-conventional it
is however a bit out of norm for my current research, it is conventional but approves of establishing the narrative
immediately and opening the scene to the video somewhat smoothly. This long
shot creates that ‘obscuring’ feeling, whilst the light work in the shot
appears inviting due to the use of bright colours, creating the entrance to the
piece. As the shot zooms in to focus on the protagonist of the music video, the
entrance point becomes more effective, as well as creating that motion needed
to drive the music video forward and introduce the cut-away no more than a
second after the shot is held. At this point however, the mise-en-scene at this
point is cruital for the story line, as often in the narrative shots are held
at mid shot, close up or dolly, rarely establishing the ideal of the
‘abandoned’, ‘obscure’ or ‘secretive’ that the video sort of requires.
00:02
Whilst establishing shots of instruments or band members
aren’t non-conventional to begin with, the directors choice of who/what
is slightly unusual; here, we have an extreme close up of the drummer at his
snare as the shot pans up quickly, and with good-quality cameras, the optical
blur in the background creates a natural, yet obscuring sense in this
introduction to the band. Normally (and more so conventionally) the first
establishing shot for the band, or shot to establish iconography, is typically
a mid-shot, close up or extreme close up of the lead singer; the drummer and
other band members are often left until later or last, to the point where that
stage is several minutes into the song or later.
00:03
However, the drummer shot only lasts a second before it
quickly cuts to the (seemingly) lead guitarist walking in front of the drummer,
strumming; this shot tracks left to right, creating the motion (more so for the
short length of shots, lasting a second) that’s needed for these shots to work
so effectively in such a short space of time.
00:06
Finally – and more so conventionally – the piece comes to
pan up on the lead singer, the shot shaking (due to the lack of a steadicam)
and the lead signers small ‘bouncing’ movement, continues the motion from the
past shots as the intro builds up to the point of the actual music beginning.
As the shot shortly rests on an extreme close up of the lead singer, this is
the most establishing sense of iconography and as the piece explores the other
band members and (after this shot) has a long establishing shot of the band on
a roof, creates that sense of iconography to All Time Low before the music actually begins or the narrative.
Although the methods of this video are slightly unusual, it has all of those
traditional conventions to an alternative rock music video, more so as it
really ‘ties up’ the scene of the band before the actual song begins.
00:08
Growing into the narrative now as momentum and pace picks up
from the song; the band is finally fully established in single sequences
(rather than the full establishing shot) as the bassist is shown after a
glimpse of narrative and guitarist. This extreme close up of the bassist as he
vigorously plays, creates that full sense of iconography as well as motion that
the composition needs to create in time with the soundtrack.
00:12
Whilst the band has seen established in this music video,
this shot in its full is genuinely interesting – more so as it also examples
light, scene and the composition of the piece. This shot is stationary, yet as
the drummer naturally moves a lot, the camerawork doesn’t need to move to
create that sense of pace – more so as it syncs up to the music effectively.
What’s important to note of this shot is the obvious half break of drummer and
the background (the setting of rooftops) and the clear indication of natural
light, to create a glowing sort of sensation to the piece; the scene itself is
conventional as the setting has that ‘derelict’ or ‘alternative’ sort of
sensation, such as Sum 41’s swimming
pool scene.
00:15
When returning back to the narrative (still following the
behind shot of the protagonist) the shot has changed considerably to an extreme
close up of the back of his head, whilst optically focusing truly on what
appears to the audience through the use of the mise-en-scene, wall and the
sparks flying (as well as other shots that showed machinery in ways) to be some
sort of plan – the actual name of the song bomb
and the lyrics, instantly interlining music and video (which is conventional)
creates that sense that the protagonist is indeed or appearing to create a bomb. The link and cinotography between
video and sound is extremely conventional of an alternative rock music video,
taking in the main chorus and actual title in a literal and strongly narrative
related model.
00:21
Straight into the lyrics and the narrative is easily brushed
into with a much slower, calmer pace than already established in the music
videos; immediately, shots such as this are held for far much longer as the
verse is a whole deal slower than the initial chorus or intro itself; at this
point and time also, there is very little but the lead singer and the drummer
as the song has yet to build up. As this character has already been shown as
the protagonist, it is natural that the close up shot such as this can be used
to establish the bases of the storyline effectively (as will be explained at 23
seconds in) however it’s interesting to note the clear use of product placement
in the music video. The first frontal shot of the protagonist, this close up,
clearly targets the ‘dre’s beats’ product effectively, whilst managing to
‘silhouette’ it into the mise-en-scene and costume of the character. Product
placement in a music video isn’t un-conventional
however it is slightly abnormal in an alternative rock music video: it is
rarely seen. Such product placements as this however, are more commonly seen in
mainstream music videos such as pop or R n B music videos – ones that make it
onto the likes of MTV for example or the charts – yet the product placement,
whilst directly obvious, also adds this edge to authenticity, whilst having
nothing to do with the actual ‘story line’ of the lyrics; it’s strictly there
for the effectiveness of trying to sell the band and the product, like a
subliminal advertisement for those who clearly listen to music (yet again, All Time Low aren’t really shy of
product placement, as being a large band, they are able to have this instituted
into their music videos, or at the same time have the effect of such literally
explained to the audience in a video such as: I Feel Like Dancing, where the actual storyline is the conventions
of an alternative rock music video). What is further unconventional about this
product placement is that it is normally expressed in the costume of the actual
band or lead singer; this is due to the iconography and ‘selling angle’ that
establishes with audiences even further more.
00:23
Whilst this shot is held for around 4 seconds, as it
slightly pans up and focus on the (previously) blurred background, the optical
filter changes to focus past the protagonist and onto the wall behind (mise-en-scene).
This mise-en-scene examples the direct link to the lyrics of Time Bomb, - as a sense of running out
of time, trying to save the one you love – as well as (due to the pace of the
song) the slower and longer held nature of the shots. The mise-en-scene at this
point in the music video particularly emphasis particular elements of the music
videos; the red line or seemingly route of ‘escape’ on the map shows the
directions between the protagonists current location and the location of what
is in the music video his ‘love’ above the larger circle; whilst the
mise-en-scene isn’t direct with the lyrics immediately, it does aid the
narrative effectively enough to make sense and drive the story further forward.
The use of mise-en-scene in such a way is extremely conventional, and from
recent research, is one of the most effect examples of narrative and
mise-en-scene.
00:25
Leading on from the mise-en-scene of the woman’s photo, the
shot is cut away to the blurred effect trim to a close up of the woman, seemingly
unconscious; again, mise-en-scene is applied to make further sense of the
current situation: the red on the blanket allows the audience to assume that
blood is apparent, pulse sensors but most importantly, what appears dog tags or
a key around her neck – this adds to the military effect of the narrative, as
well as the idea of being ‘obscure’ vigilantes or even spy’s.
00:35
As the song begins to encounter the bridge pre-chorus
(naturally picking up pace and atmosphere) the piece on queue and in sync,
introduces the brewing climax to the video and song; introducing troops. This
low shot of the troops boots and obvious swinging of gun, is obscuring, yet is
clear to the viewer that these are troops. At this point, the shots become shorter
as the pace is slightly increased and the guitar is introduced more profoundly.
00:41
This shot is the most effect close up example of
mise-en-scene in the piece; although the viewer is not aware of what it is the
protagonist has – or why he is beginning to run – what appears through mise-en-scene
is that he has some sort of ‘bomb’ or ‘weapon’; this is the most direct example
of mise-en-scene and narrative towards the actual lyrics of the song, which is
conventional and effective to explore the song’s meaning or fantasy.
00:54
This shot is particularly effective as it creates an immense
sense of motion as it tracks the guitarist running and jumping around to the
front of the drummer whilst playing; at this point of the chorus and at the
songs intensity of pace and dynamic sound, is extremely useful to push forward the
live performance and begin to introduce the narrative once more.
00:55
Going into the narrative, the same sense of motion is
continued, as it tracks the protagonist running down the stairs and forward,
attempting to escape the armed forces; again mise-en-scene is effective here
once more as the spray painted ‘no’ in the background is a symbolic message in
the piece for the protagonists ability to not give up although in the face of
danger (shown by the armed forces group shots and mise-en-scene) and again,
another link to the lyrics of its message of determination. All of these conventions
work effectively together to type up the music video in means of over-all video
to music fantasy as well as example of cinotography; what is interesting from
what lacks in conventions is the strong sense in iconography that is
established so strongly in other music videos.
00:58
This shot of the protagonist jumping over the rails
continues these conventional sense of motion to reflect the speed of the chorus,
and the intensity of the lyrics and name time
bomb further ( as though he was running out of time ) the conduction of this
shot in camerawork is slightly unique in the terms of its panning to follow,
its speed showing control as the protagonist is clearly in focus and central of
the shot at all times.
01:01
Iconography hasn’t really been established as much as other
music videos, yet all the same it still does it, just not as much.
Conventionally to note however, the piece comes to focus on a mid-shot of the
lead singer for a second, to establish that connection with the viewer as well
as himself.
01:02
Whilst there aren’t a lot of conventionally close-up shots of
the lead singer, there is however a lot of establishing shots of the band (notably,
a high angle shot, suggesting and creating a minimal effect to the band); these
establishing shots as a whole really create the sense of iconography that the
band is the selling point, the image of this music video and not the lead
singer as normally is found in music videos. Mise-en-scene is also effective
when noticed in this shot: the lead singer has a t-shirt on saying ‘no regrets’
which really interlinks with the lyrics ‘we’re like a time bomb’ and the
message from the video that love is worth the effort. At this point and time
also, it is also considerably worthy to note the ‘costume’ of the band in its entirety
through an establishing shot; all of the band members are wearing black or
white, which is conventional for the alternative rock atmosphere.
01:04
This shot, in combination with the mise-en-scene, helps to
tie the narrative together, and suggest that the protagonist is running away
from the armed forces, the firing in this shot expresses the literal meaning of
time in combination with the song’s
lyrics and atmosphere as visually expressed in fantasy; again, making the
narrative of the music video extremely conventional.
01:25
This extreme close up whilst the guitarist plays really emphasis
on the soundtrack to the music video, whilst synced up yet abstract, it
continues to create that sense of iconography and remind the viewer of the
performance parts as well as the narrative; this shot in its visual and
iconography effects is conventional, more so as the focus is pointed to the
fingers as he plays.
01:36
This shot has the camerawork conventions of an alternative
rock music video, however when put into focus and role, this shot is rather
unconventional; here, the camera has a mid-shot of the bassist as he sings back-up
vocals, the mid-shot creates this sense of iconography and establishment
further within the band, however when emphasis of singing is taken upon in the
music video, it is conventionally the lead singer that is the focus. What is
also particularly noticeable (yet not quite mise-en-scene) is the ‘flash’ of tattoos
as the bassist plays, relating with the alternative rock audience for the more adventurous,
younger age group.
01:43
The terms of editing in this music video expresses a very
sleek, very tuned and synced up piece that really uses the climaxes and the
paces within the song – or particular riffs and lyrics – to emphasis particular
parts of the narrative; or, as at this point, aid the cut away between live
performance and narrative. Coming closer to the solo and the end of the song,
the piece becomes more wrapped up towards building that ‘grand finally’
sensation as the piece really gets off the ground. Here, when the drummer hits
the crash, the piece jumps to the troops storming a building on the note,
clearly and effectively using the music to move and switch between the two
effectively through editing. This is extremely conventional in alternative rock
music videos, as it allows a clean break or division between live performance and
narrative, allowing the piece to effectively interlink and cut away between the
two with the soundtrack.
01:46
The same editing and sync up is used here, so when the shot
gun is fired, the initial shot is on another crash note, creating that depth of
note and significance in the music to correspond visually.
01:47 – 02:09
For nearly all of this second chorus, it is only shots of
the band during live performance; as the images above demonstrate, the bouts of
the band are run over again as to establish the band effectively for each
individual, as well as a band in entirety, creating that full sense of
iconography. The shots are held for slightly longer, if not a second each than
previously, yet quickly change between the band members. Whilst the camerawork
isn’t unconventional, the length of the live performance focus is however;
often in alternative rock music videos, establishment and iconography shots are
often swapped up in-between live performance and narrative, to create that
sense of music and band between the ‘fantasy’ or physical embodiment of the
lyrics. This section actually in terms of editing, seems too long dragged out
without any narrative to divide it up and with nearly 30 seconds under the
belt, that is a considerable amount of the music video (an estimated 1/6 of the
music video in effect). Whilst this may have been done so that the narrative
could sync up with certain parts of the song, such as timing or lyrics, it does
however not work as effectively.
02:15
Although the live performance section lasted for about 30
seconds, when the narrative actually returns to the young woman in real time
(not in a dreamlike state, as to why the blur effect was used) is at the bridge
between the chorus and the solo of the song a.k.a the calmest part of this rock
music video. This shot is held for a considerable longer amount of time than
others throughout the video; the editing becomes slower to reflect the pace of
the song and its emphasis in the tempo also, this is conventional for alternative
rock music videos, however slow motion effects are often used in the past
videos I have looked at to effectively ‘fill this gap’.
02:20
The composition on this mid-shot really aids the narrative
in the music video, as it shows the obvious connection, care or otherwise
viewed by the audience as affectionate love that helps the lyrics relate to the
video in the music video, as running out of time for the love, conventionally
working on many levels in the narrative to fully embody this.
02:24
Once more, mise-en-scene is used effectively here to
continue the ideal of this item that the protagonist is carrying to be something
of worth, or otherwise a ‘bomb’ of sorts, when relating to the name of the song
and the lyrics. Again, this is used conventionally to create the ‘fantasy’ that
corresponds to the atmosphere, tone and message in the song.
02:35
Like before, the crash cymbal from the drums is once again
used to create that signifying change within the narrative – this time it is
used to introduce the sudden awakening of the young woman; the editing and the
music being used in such a way is conventional as is the close up on the young
woman as her eyes immediately engage with the audience, creating that focus and
significance once more.
02:38
This shot doesn’t really have anything to do with convention
other than the significance of the heart beat coming back, the idea that there
is still time from the lyrics and narrative in the song, but I found the shot
particularly interesting as it presents two views. The viewer will naturally
view the heartbeat, yet with consideration will notice the young woman rising
from bed in the heart monitor reflection; the optical view in this piece is
used to fully aid the shot as the rest of the heart monitor is out of focus.
02:49
In the pause between bridge and third
chorus, the camera quickly pans down onto the band, jumping straight into a mid-shot
of the lead singer as he repeats the chorus once more. The speed of this shot
and the motion in it, even during the pause, helps the music and video to
continue forward and reintroduce itself effectively, as well as pick up that
tempo and pace of the chorus immediately after the considerably slower bridge.
Jumping back into the mid shot really ignites that sense of closeness as well
as iconography from the band altogether; both with both, these are very
conventional uses of camera work and editing as it effectively brings the
change from narrative, bridge and chorus to live performance effectively
together, and re-create that reflection and atmosphere (even speed) of the
song.
03:02
This is the point where the live performance and the
narrative clash together, with really no explanation as to what role the band
play within the narrative, or as to why they have suddenly become one, it sort
of creates a non-realistic atmosphere of the narrative immediately, and sort of
cuts the recreation of the lyrics and therefore the fantasy of it dead short.
This is unconventional; live performance and narrative (even if the band are
included) are normally kept separated – even From Yesterday managed to do that with the clear division of shots,
yet as this would demonstrate with the optical view and tracking of the
protagonist and the young woman from the lead signers point of view would
suggest, the two domains of an alternative rock music video have really clashed
together in a very unconventional matter. At this point the lack of conventions
in this music video becomes more obvious, such as a lack of a live performance band,
to signify to the viewer that this is an alternative rock music video. Whilst
it doesn’t totally recreate the image or what the video actually is, it does in
respect create a slightly hindering yet view to it.
03:16
This is the shot that the piece fades out on, the long
establishing shot of the band and the mid shot of the troop leader really emphasis
more on clash between live performance and narrative, yet sort of creates a
total division between it at the same time, as neither recognise the other. As
unconventional as this is, from this shot it does sort of work, but hinders the
conventional effects of the narrative’s mise-en-scene and relation to the
lyrics of the song.
No comments:
Post a Comment